Back to comparisons

Comparison

Magnesium L-Threonate vs EGCG (Green Tea)

FieldMagnesium L-ThreonateEGCG (Green Tea)
Categoryneuroprotectiveneuroprotective
Dose range1000–2000mg200–500mg
Half-life6h
Onset
EvidenceEVIDENCEBEVIDENCEA
Safety●●●●●●●●●
Legal (US)USOTCUSOTC
PubMed refs904800

The comparison in plain English

Auto-generated from data

Magnesium L-Threonate and EGCG (Green Tea) are both in the neuroprotective category respectively. Magnesium L-Threonate MIT-developed magnesium that crosses the blood-brain barrier. EGCG (Green Tea) Most abundant catechin in green tea.

Bottom line

Magnesium L-Threonate (evidence B, safety 5/5) has a stronger evidence base than EGCG (Green Tea) (evidence A, safety 4/5). Magnesium L-Threonate has the slightly cleaner safety profile. For users new to either, the higher-evidence option is the safer first try.

Choose Magnesium L-Threonate if

Magnesium L-Threonate is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (L-threonate is a sugar-acid carrier that uniquely enables magnesium to cross the blood-brain barrier in meaningful quantities, most oral magnesium forms (oxide, citrate, glycinate) raise serum magnesium but not central magnesium) and the dose range (1000–2000mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is 6h.

Choose EGCG (Green Tea) if

EGCG (Green Tea) is the better fit when your goal aligns with its mechanism (Powerful antioxidant, one of the most reactive natural radical scavengers known) and the dose range (200–500mg) suits your protocol. Half-life is –h.

Build a stack with bothOpen builder →
Check interactionsOpen checker →